Proportionality is at the forefront of all litigation following the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR). The aim is to achieve a just result with appropriate speed and expense. The overriding objective, covered under CPR 1.1 requires Courts to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost.  When working out proportionality, the Courts will consider the amount of money involved, the complexity of the issues, the importance of the case and the financial position of all parties.


Under CPR costs which are disproportionate may be disallowed or reduced even if they were reasonably or necessarily incurred.

Should a claim fall within the small claims track thereby amounting to the value of £10,000.00 or less, under CPR 27.14(2) legal costs may not be recoverable or limited in recoverability.  Such fees are limited under the CPR Part 45, unless it can be shown that the other party has behaved so unreasonably that it would be appropriate for the Court to do so (CPR Part 27.14(2)(g)) but note that the test for unreasonableness is subject to judicial discretion.  You should, therefore, always consider the cost proportionality before considering issuing Court proceedings.  It may be that mediation may be a more cost-effective way of recovering monies owed whilst also maintaining a reasonable relationship with the other party.


We try to ensure that our clients’ costs are proportionate to the case in hand.


If you want to know more please call us on 01202 877400 or email

Angie Newnham
Article by Angie Newnham
Having worked for various law firms in the Bournemouth and Poole area Angie Newnham decided to set up her own business in 2010. Angie’s experience covers a range of legal disciplines including Property Law and Conveyancing, which includes both residential, commercial and agricultural work, Social Housing, Landlord & Tenant issues, Wills, Lasting Power of Attorney and a niche interest in equine law and equestrian agreements.

Leave a comment